Feedback Case Library

Contained on this page are a collection of feedback scenarios Residents and Faculty encounter in their day-to-day routines.

The purpose of documenting these scenarios and presenting them as cases, is to encourage us to anticipate and reflect on how we may manage them.

If there are any feedback scenarios that you would like us to add, please feel free to send us your suggestions at cbme.facdev@utoronto.ca

For your convenience, we have linked the corresponding worksheets in Word format, which contain the cases and some guiding questions. Feel free to add or change the cases below to best suit your needs: Sample Cases Worksheet and Complete Feedback Scenario Library.

Case 1

“One challenging feedback/coaching conversation occurred with a Resident who had no insight into his/her weaknesses. When I brought them to his/her attention, he/she was very resistant to the feedback and emphasized that he/she felt he/she was unfairly judged, and the resident actually got fairly emotional. I think it perhaps had a bit to do with my delivery, as well as this Resident’s lack of insight.”

Case 2

“A Resident raised concerns about receiving ITERs which were quite good, but did not reflect the discussion the Faculty had with the Resident in person. Their scores were very good, but despite the Resident knowing there was robust feedback from Faculty sometimes there are absolutely no comments written on the ITER at all, and residents are consistently letting us know that the comments are the most important part of the form for them to grow, not just the numbers.”

Case 3

“I received feedback from a Faculty member that made a general, but critical/negative comment about my manner with patients, but then received no information as to the specific behaviours that caused this, or tips or coaching on how to move forward and make improvements in the future…”

Case 4

“As a Resident, I receive compliments or generic feedback. I’m told to keep doing what I am doing, ‘terrific to work with,’ ‘read more around cases,’ etc. While nice to hear, how do I reach the next level?”

Case 5

“From a Faculty perspective, raising issues, and providing constructive feedback can be challenging with some Residents as they don’t feel a sense of the Resident ‘accepting’ the feedback, they may feel the Residents ‘get their back up’ or ‘don’t agree’ and perhaps blame others for the behaviours etc. These are sometimes the scenarios where Faculty have received a ‘retribution’ evaluation and feel that it is ‘not worth it’ to do again in the future.”

Case 6

“Sometimes, I know I’ve had a bad day in terms of my performance in the OR or clinic– perhaps exposure to a task I realize I’m struggling with, or difficulties managing difficult interpersonal interactions. At the end of the day, though, I sometimes feel people are worried to tell me honestly how I performed, and how to improve, and generic feedback is provided. This leaves me with uncertainty and questions – is my performance too difficult to discuss? How bad was it really?”

Case 7

“A Resident presented a case that illustrated that s/he missed the point in a history (i.e., that the symptom history in the case was important in arriving at a treatment plan). I asked several (too many?) questions to illustrate the gap and s/he started to demonstrate distress (i.e. face red, voice stressed, etc). I backed off, said something like ‘I am sorry I upset you,’ and continued on the clinic. The remainder of the rotation was completed uneventfully.”

Case 8

“A challenging feedback/coaching scenario was when there was a difficult clinical event that wasn’t very well managed and the opportunity for feedback was delayed. Returning to discuss the difficult event after a few days made the conversation more challenging.”

Case 9

“Someone whose confidence seems fragile – you want to try to bolster them up and fear that giving feedback may make them feel more insecure. At times, we feel like we may be being too gentle or too firm. How do we adjust the feedback to match the style that will resonate best with the trainee? How do we identify what form of feedback or coaching delivery will work best for the individual?”

© Postgraduate Medical Education, University of Toronto